Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. Essay

Krispy Kreme mobs, as discussed in Darden Business Publishing untroubled example UVA-F-1479, appears to be at a crossroads. After years of astronomical growth, the federation find its dowery set plummeting in the midst of discoveries about faulty score practices. The following paper examines several(prenominal) issues behind the jerky decline First, the historical income statements and eternal sleep sheets are examined to determine the monetary health and current condition of the confederation. This is followed by an analysis of key fiscal ratios across time and versus industry standards. Next, the paper addresses if Krispy Kreme is financially healthy at year-end 2003 and, if so, what accounts for the firms recent share harm decline. The paper concludes with a discussion of the integral investment value in the beau monde.Income Statement and Balance SheetsClose review of the income statement leads to some nonable conclusions. The first quarterly column of the 2004 in come statement portrays that the confederacy gained thirty-four million long horses in discontinued trading operations from the sale of the Montana Mills venture. In the same quarter the firm lost approximately twenty-four million dollars. It is promising that this maneuver was made to deflect attention from or make up for the companys poor performance and mounting losses. Generally, this is non a chump of a healthy company but rather signals an alarm since the loss in that quarter was closer to fifty-eight million dollars when not considering the sale. Krispy Kreme may have been struggling to make ends meet through its operations, and perhaps the company hoped to make up lost income through the sale of a venture.Further much than than, in operation(p)(a) expenses were increasing while net income was decreasing. In whitethorn 2004, the company had seven million dollars in closing costs and lock showed losses. An aggressive expansion dodging did not result in enough in come to cover these costs. Additionally, quarterly comps decreased dramatically. From May 2003 to May 2004, operating income dropped from $23,702 million to $18,636 million. This decrease is even more pronounced when examining the quarters ending in August. Krispy Kremes balance sheet is no less indicative of poor financial health, particularly with a substantial emergence in year over year long-term liability figures. The two major contributors to this increase in long-term liabilities admit Krispy Kremes revolving lines of credit and its long-term debt.First, the revolving lines of credit greatly increased from nothing in fiscal year 2002 to eighty-seven million dollars in fiscal year 2004, demonstrating a burgeoning dependence by Krispy Kreme on outside finance to support operations. Second, long-term debt increased from 3,912 million in 2002 to 48,056 million in 2004. This anomalous and signifi houset increase in long term debt could bastardly that Krispy Kreme is having trou ble overcompensateing rancid its debt. After analyzing both the income statement and balance sheet an initial assumption can me made that Krispy Kreme does not appear to be financially healthy. The next step of understanding this case is to determine how financial ratios blow up our understanding of the abovel statements.Financial RatiosThe following financial ratios were analyzed dissolute ratio, current ratio, hap on assets, return on equity, net profit margin, receivables disturbance, inventory turnover, asset turnover, cash turnover, debt-to-equity, and clock interest earned. These ratios are include in a time series (Case Exhibit 7) sustain and in a cross-sectional graph of quick-service restaurants (Case Exhibit 8).To begin, the time series ratios are detailed in Figure 1. Starting with the liquidity ratios we observe some significance in the changes of the current ratio. The increases in the current ratio in 2003 and 2004 signal that Krispy Kreme is espousal over the long term, not the short term, resulting in an increase of cash affecting assets. The current liabilities would not be affected by this increase in cash or long term. This corroborates the balance sheet, as with the current ratio rise we see a gain in cash and cash equivalents positive a gain in long term debt.Figure 1. Krispy Kreme Analytical Financial RatiosThe debt-to-equity ratio in 2003 and 2004 imply the company is also exploitation more long-term debt from shareholder equity to run the company. In 2004, the balance sheet shows a jump in the number of share of common stock. The selling of more stock to pay for long term debt is not usually a good signal to investors. It may mean a corporation wants more cash to finance activities, which in conjunction with other figures could mean it is trying to offset some losses. A lower times interest earned ratio may also mean fewer clams are available to meet interest payments and that the business is more vulnerable to increases in interest rates. This ratio has declined dramatically since 2002. Negative findings of the company are apparent when look at the activity ratios.The receivables turnover ratio has been declining since 2001. This decline in receivables turnover implies that company is not universe as efficient in the collection of accounts owed as it should be. Not collecting the credit in a timely manner means that they are not gaining interest for the firm, but potentially giving others a free loan for the time being. Furthermore, the asset turnover ratio for Krispy Kreme has been declining since the company went public in 2000. As seen in Figure 1, the ratio was at a high in 2000 at 2.10 and is not at 1.01 in 2004. This lower asset turnover ratio signals that the company is not doing hearty in using its assets to generate sales. The final subcategory in the time series ratio analysis are the profitability ratios, which show some positive signs for Krispy Kreme. The return on assets ratio is rela tively stable at 8.64% in 2004.Krispy Kreme is still doing relatively well by using current assets to generate income. Unfortunately, the return on assets has come dump from a high of 10.33% in 2002, a signal to investors that Krispy Kreme is not ameliorating its use of assets to create income. However, the operating profit margin ratio displayed a steady increase for the company, resulting in more operating income for every(prenominal) dollar of sales. The increasing net profit margin also shows Krispy Kreme is generating more profit for every dollar of sales. The change from 6.81% to 8.58% in 2004 shows that Krispy Kreme is now making another 1.7 cents per dollar of sales. Examination of the financial ratios between Krispy Kreme and its peers in the quick-service restaurant industry reveals a few key facts about the companys financial state. maiden is the relatively high liquidity index of the corporation as measured by both the quick and the current ratios.Compared to a respec tive mean of 0.80 and 1.17 for each aforementioned ratio, Krispy Kreme weighs in at 2.72 for the former and 3.25 for the latter(prenominal) approximately three times the average. As these figures measure a firms ability to pay bills in the short term without stress, it may not be farfetched to suggest Krispy Kreme has liquefied more of its assets to satisfy the doubts of short-term creditors. This band-aid solution may be short-lived, however, since current assets and liabilities are never a time-tested tool for forecasting. Exorbitant liquidity also suggests an ineffective use of cash and other short-term assets and a lack of borrowing power. The other noteworthy aspect of these industry ratios is the low level of turnover on both receivables and inventory.Krispy Kremes receivables turnover ratio of 9.70 is about four times smaller than the mean of 37.51 for almost quick-service restaurants. This is possibly an indication of the firms inability to collect on its due bills. Inve ntory turnover for the corporation is at a ratio of 17.76 versus the industry mean of 64.70, also about four times less than standard. Low inventory turnover can signify a poor management of verbalise inventory. Combined with poor cash management, this spells trouble for investors. Nevertheless, there is a redeeming factor for the corporation, although given the looming sale of several stores, it may not be one that lasts very long. The profitability ratios of Krispy Kreme are comparable to those indoors the industry, and a good set of such ratios is a reflection of how efficiently a firm uses its assets and how well it manages its operations.In order for Krispy Kreme to make good on these numbers, it will need to convince creditors of its long-term solvency and break its turnover. At the end of fiscal year 2003, the financial health of Krispy Kreme is neither stellar nor abysmal. The company has several indications of future tribulations that it needs to sort out, but from a fin ancial standpoint it is relatively in good standing and could be said to pass the litmus test of profitability. Some symptoms it needs to examine include its acutely high short-term solvency. Does the firm find itself liquefying at an excessive rate to satisfy short-term creditors?If so, the company needs to reduce the scale of its operations and cut costs until longer-term loans are able to be secured. At that point, it may be able to grow again without the burden of investor and media hype. Furthermore, the firm needs to implement pressure to its debtors and try to improve its receivable turnover ratio. In this way, Krispy Kreme may be able to raise more capital and manage its assets more effectively. Finally, with the increased scrutiny and speculation concerning the companys financial reporting, it should seriously address these concerns and restore investor confidence before stock prices continued to decline.Stock Price military ratingGiven Krispy Kremes mixed financial health , what accounts for sharp decline in its share price? On May 27, 2004 Krispy Kreme announced poor results for the first time in its history as a public company. Earnings were down 10% due to the trend toward low carbohydrate diets, or at least as reported by the company . Krispy Kreme decided to divest Montana Mills for $40 million in stock and also planned to close three of its new Hot Doughnut and Coffee shops. The Wall Street Journal published a negative story on the accounting principles that Krispy Kreme used for franchise acquisitions. The company also had to pay Michigan franchises top decision maker $5 million as part of a severance package.On July 29th, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commision (SEC) launched an informal investigating on franchise reacquisitions and the companys previously announced reduction in earnings guidance. In September 2004, Krispy Kreme announced that it would reduce number of new stores from 120 to around 60. In the low of 2005, the company announ ced previously issued financial statements for fiscal year ended 2004 would be restated to correct trusted errors.Krispy Kreme then delayed the filing of its financial reports until the SECs investigation had been resolved. Numerous problems, both big and hidden, tarnished once-optimistic forecasts for Krispy Kreme, changing it from a solid company to a risk. Investors have now lost confidence and the share price has steadily dropped. Although the companys actual financial health may have been more benign, public perception has been sullied nearly irreparably.Intrinsic Investment ValueBarring incisive and insightful financial analysis, there must be a source of intrinsic investment value in the company which can be gleaned from financial statements. The perceived quality and expectations of the investors hass a strong influence on this ingrained value. If the investors feel that a company will be profitable the intrinsic value will likely increase and vice versa. Intrinsic value also has much to do with brand image, as in Krispy Kremes distinctive green and red vintage logo, its Hot Doughnuts Now neon sign and the perceived quality of the doughnuts.These accoutrements drive traffic and sales, two key indicators of a food service companys health. Furthermore, the central Krispy Kreme retail concept, The Factory Store, is a prime contributor to intrinsic value. Krispy Kreme creation of a doughnut theatre illustrated by custom machinery and doughnut viewing areas is a significant point of preeminence from its competitors by offering more than just a product but a complete experience. These astute differences add to the Krispy Kreme mystique, which adds a level of perceived quality.ConclusionThe brief history of Krispy Kreme since its IPO in 2000, reveals a company that has already seen its ups and downs. These undulations characterize the growth of many such firms. Several conclusions on the state of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts can be drawn from the Darden School case. First, Krispy Kreme is a company that is moderately healthy, but seems to be turning for the worse. Second, a time series profitability ratios suggest good health, but peer-to-peer current and quick ratios show a startling scramble to meet short-term obligations. Third, in an era of high-profile accounting scandals, clandestine reporting practices intimidate off investors, leading to Krispy Kremes decline in share price. Finally, Krispy Kreme may be able to mountain on its brand equity to leverage poor financial practices.