Plato's The Republic Criticism of Democracy Essay

Platos The Republic critical re look let out of Democracy - Essay ExampleInstead, Plato favored the Republic as the best form of government. His depiction of a Republic was one where it was ruled by the lovers of wisdom and/or the lovers of honor. This is quite turnabout to instantlys belief that commonwealth is the best and the only fully justifiable political organisation. Todays concept of res publica has been popularized specifically with the American view of democracy as a government of the throng by the people and for the people.As much as it may seem surprising, Plato found inherent flaws in democracy as a political system and as a form of government. More surprising is the fact that although Platos thoughts may seem to be overaged and ancient, his criticisms of democracy atomic number 18 quite in certain modern democratic societies. Platos criticism of democracy is hinged on his belief that democracy has the tendency to degenerate into anarchy. This, he believes, is democracys greatest weakness. Although such a belief may not seem as apparent in todays democratic societies, a deeper analysis of certain democracies today may reveal that there is indeed some truth to Platos assertions. However, one must not be mistaken in thinking that the flaws of democracy that may be applicable to the modern form of democracy predominant in todays world cannot be changed. These flaws are not fundamental to all democracies today. There are but certain democratic societies that need to alter their political system because of certain flaws that are contrary to the fundamental principles of modern democracy.Plato views democracy as the second worst form of government. In his work, The Republic, he points out that the biggest weakness of a democracy is that it can easily die to anarchy. Moreover, because of its essential features coupled with certain attributes of man, a democracy can lead to tyranny. His rationale behind his dislike for democracy is that democra cy tends to lead to lush freedom. Although Plato believes in the significance and true value of freedom, he asserts that with the form that democracy takes, it is not unlikely for people to exercise excessive freedom. When people have the freedom to do as they please, there is that tendency to lead to anarchy. Democracy is hinged on the ideology that every person has the equal right and equal capa urban center to lead. However, in Platos point of view, he sees this as an avenue which may lead to a government that is ruled by individuals in pursuit of personal gains rather than for public good. In The Republic, Plato wrote....Is it not the excess and greed of this and the discount of all other things that revolutionizes this constitution too and prepares the way for the necessity of a dictatorship... ...When a democratic city athirst for self-reliance gets bad cupbearers for its leaders and is intoxicated by drinking too deep of that incorrupt wine, and then, if its so-called gov ernors are not extremely mild and gentle with it and do not dispense the liberty unstintedly, it chastises them and accuses them of being accursed oligarch.In this sense, democracy is indeed highly corruptible. Democracy, viewed from this light, opens gates to demagogues, potential dictators, and can thence lead to tyranny.Before, one judges Platos view, it must be noted that his conception of democracy is based on what he saw in Athenian democracy. In certain respects, not all of his thoughts and ideas may be applicable to